Tag Archives: life

I gaze at the messages coming in

I gaze at the messages coming, one after another, as if following a militant command. It seemed like a rally, like they were all of a like mind for once; that they all cared. Then I read each one. Rachel was as she often is: floundering, her stabbing at buttons capturing a fluttering mind, ever torn from a competing distraction, like her kids pawing at her legs, a dog nuzzling into her groin. “I have plans for Saturday…I’m…not sure I can be at your memorial,” she wrote, clearly multi-tasking. Paul was predictably gruff and terse, like he was typing out his thoughts in the moments before passing out: “I’m not available on the 13th” is what he managed before sandwiching himself back in his headset. He won’t have read the whole message, was only half-getting the context that I’d introduced. Memorial? What the hell’s he talking about? Dean was a bit more clued in. “Call me if you wanna talk”, he’d offered, if haplessly. Actually, it was more forced than hapless. He didn’t wanna talk. Dean never wanted to talk. He wasn’t sure he even meant what he said. He just thought it was something you’re supposed to say in these situations—situations where someone is dying, he meant. And that was what was happening, despite all the denial. The rest of Dean’s text betrayed his awkwardness. He might be able to attend the memorial, but only if it was in the afternoon, and not bleeding into the evening. Yeah, bleeding. Also, what was going to be served? He asked. His new partner was vegan, he explained, and he, as ever, had an issue with dairy products.

              These are my friends, my inner circle. I know. Who needs enemies, and all that. They mean well. I know because they say so on X, on their Instagram pages, and with all the effort that goes into a periodic “like”. Dean’s emogees are clever at least. So, too, are Paul’s voice messages, though I think the last one was from an AI thing that he was showing off—something to do with his job. I figure he’ll call me again with that new toy of his, ask me for some money, as a prank. I’ve thought about holding off this thing until I’d gotten an AI replacement myself. That would maintain continuity, keep the business and social circles going while things were in transition. Perhaps my substitute could hand residual calls from my customers, explain that I or someone would get back to them, take care of their orders, answer their questions. Gotta keep selling til’ the end. Meanwhile, I’d dispatch someone or thing to handle Rachel’s birthday gift, whatever that might be. I just feed in her info, patch in the profile from her something page and then it all take care of itself. Come to think of it, this reminds of what the doctors said as they slid me into the MRI tube, only to then watch with sighing dismay when the results weren’t quite what they’d expected. What a bummer for them. What a drag it must be, being oncologists. They had to stay late that day, take some time to say that my days were numbered. And the friends: I told ‘em, sort of. I told ‘em the numbers, as in the something something cell count (yeah, you’d only half listen if you were being told this shit, also), and the days left count—that landed with a bit more of a thud.

              Lucy was the last to call after my text announcement. She’s always been the last to know things, my darling Lucy: my erstwhile hook-up, my prior-to-that crush. She cared about my feelings once, though she was slow to catch on that they were, in fact, feelings. “Oh my God,” she started, like she always started conversations, as if she were ever catching on late to a dark joke. “Why didn’t you tell me it was this bad”. That’s another thing I love about her. There’s nothing she can’t or won’t blame another for, especially when it comes to dying. She knows because she’s dealt with a lot of people dying, she says, usually in reference to people who love her. It’s dangerous to love her, I inferred once upon a time. It’s more dangerous now, I think. “Sorry to bother you with this,” I said to her. Shamefully manipulative, I know. “I knew you were struggling,” she replied, speaking past my lame effort. Pity sex. It’s never too late to get some, I figure, still thinking in sales pitches. It always worked for Lucy to not really listen, somehow. “I knew what you were going through with the…ya know…but I didn’t know it was as bad as…ya know”. She didn’t know it was as bad as this because she didn’t really know what it was. Denial is useful that way. Anyway, then came the advice: “You should have taken a mental health day. That’s always worked for me”. This is where our age difference comes in, kinda how it came between us before, which meant I had no chance. Lucy is of that generation that thinks stress entitles a day off from work or school. To have stress and deal with the day to day—that’s unhealthy, she thinks.

              Then she made her move, her intervention. “Can’t you delay your plan or whatever until…I don’t know…can’t you just hold out a little longer?”

              “What’s the point?” I moaned.

              “I don’t know. I read the letter you sent to the group, and I get it—don’t try to talk you out of it. But seriously, just put if off for a while. Take a one day at a time approach. That’s how I stopped drinking, just one day at a time. I got two years clean now, did I tell you?”

              “Yeah, congratulations. I’m proud of you”

              “Yeah, thanks. Anyway, when I have my next birthday, I want you there to celebrate, plus the others”

              “You’ll never get us all together like that”. Now I was sounding bitter. “We’ll forget. We’ll pay lip service to it, all agree on the idea. But no one will step forward, actually make it happen. See, none of us is really here. That’s why I can plan something and send out an invitation to a fake event. It’s like everything else—it’s just something that might happen.”

              “You don’t know that. We may surprise you”. She paused and fell silent. For idle seconds, I could just about make out her stutter, trying to think what to say next; whether to really care. “You don’t really mean it, do you? You wouldn’t do it.”

              “Nah, of course not. I just wanted to see what you’d all say if I made a threat. I wanted to see if it would change anything, disrupt anyone’s schedule, or force you or anyone to say something you’ve never said before”.

              “What do you want us to say?”

              “I don’t know. I just know I don’t want to request what I want you to say”.

              “I don’t know what to say”

              “Don’t worry, you said it already”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hot Minutes of Time

Four-thirty in the afternoon on a Friday in a quiet if uncomfortably warm office space atop a four-story building. This is not a school, a playground, or a deserted trail wherein the transient or marginal hold territorial advantage. The era wherein my mind was ever on the alert for the intrusions of the wild is well behind me, I complacently think. I have no tense readiness in my chest, my limbs, my mind. I have no flexed startle response to unfurl at the sound of disquiet. Work is scheduled neatly from one hour to the next. The spaces in between are fixed within easy parameters. A genteel, professional atmosphere prevails amongst others who have likewise arrived and long settled into civilized existence.

At home, away from the office which is suburbanly-situated, I feel nature’s playful and unthreatening incursion. Squirrels chase one another at dawn, scratching away upon rooftop tiles, acting like naughty children on Christmas morning. At night, an owl hoots with a haughty attitude and watches stolidly from a high tree. At some other time of day, woodpeckers thrash their bullet-hard heads against wood and sometimes pause, unperturbed, because their heads play a different game than mine, and have some manner of airbag behind the eyes to absorb impact. Ducks fly down upon a nearby pool, appearing to dive bomb one another, separating runts from leaders, creating havoc, but eliciting little more from me than, “hey, get over here…you gotta see this!” It all seems like a delightful spectacle until the eye catches sight of a less welcome visitor, a long-tailed rodent that scurries away like the other creatures do, but with slightly greater knowledge that its presence is somewhat more hateful and stirring of disgust.

It isn’t nice to think this of any creature, one of God’s creatures, after all. But it’s not quite the same as the mustering of rage or fear that arises from human provocation. Recently, a friend of mine received a sobering, zeitgeisty lesson from one of his daughters, straight from the frontlines of feminine trauma. It seems that a casual discussion of day-to-day life yielded an earnest question about whether women might prefer aloneness in the woods with a grizzly bear in proximity versus the same scenario with a stranger man. The daughter said the latter scene would be more unnerving, and added a touch of duh to her commentary when her father expressed surprise. The rationale was logical; that is, historically evidence-based. The daughter had never been assaulted or harassed by a stranger bear, she asserted, implying a woman’s norm. The father was disturbed yet galvanized, and moved to an empathetic awareness of women’s physical vulnerability in this world. As is my wont, I poked a hole in the message (having heard this second hand), pointing out complicating factors: of course, this fear of men versus bears bears being taken seriously by men, but what also bears observation are the flaws involved in comparing apples and oranges, as women generally do not get their intimacy needs met by, ahem, bears, so there is little emotional conflict involved in keeping a distance from them. Yes, that situation in the woods, like many, is dangerous. But most situations are dangerous in part because of the desires that place us there.

Exceptions? Hard to say. My destined-to-be-misunderstood-by-someone point presumes a heteronormative baseline, plus a belief in the inherent agency that people (okay, children excepted) feel in this world. Wait…is that view…humannormative? Am I overlooking the power that children exert over adults, as in what actually happened to me a week or so ago? I don’t get my intimacy or professional (mostly) needs met by adolescents currently, but that didn’t stop a pair of them from penetrating my complacent and privileged silo and giving me a lesson in…something. See, that’s the thing with animals and kids—neither of whom use words when exhibiting their natures—for what they have to teach me is not intended per se, but instead merely unleashed. I didn’t ask them to loiter in the hallways of my office building, looking for someone to harass or assault. And the boys in question on the fateful day I’m about to describe were not cute, as far as I was concerned.

It started, as I started with my retelling here, around about four-thirty in the afternoon when a rather diffident-looking boy of about fifteen walked before one of the windows to my office suite. This was unusual because to do this the boy was traversing a pathway that runs around the perimeter of the building’s top floor level and is only about a foot-and-a-half wide around the stretch that surrounds my office. As he passed, he made no eye contact with me and seemed impassive, as if he’d simply lost his way and was looking for a proper exit. I thought little of it and proceeded with my then telehealth-heavy day which often has me looking into my computer monitor and sometimes above it to gaze out of my window, mostly to see bucolic sights stretching towards the hills, and ever so rarely to see someone—if so, typically a building workman—navigating this narrow path, attending to some repair job or other.

When the boy disappeared from view, I shook my head, briefly distracted and bemused, if not quite amused, and then I went about my business. But within the hour I felt a commotion beyond my office door in the hallways. Someone or thing was scurrying about, creaking the sturdy boards beneath the well-carpeted floors. If it could talk, the foundation would say, we’re not used to this, but we can take it. At that moment, I thought I could take it also, because it hadn’t yet impinged upon me. That changed moments later when I heard and felt a violent rapping upon my office door. Someone was banging their fists upon its mid-riff. Were they alerting me to an emergency? Was it an assailant looking to crash through the barrier and do me harm? Was it ICE coming to get me? Actually, only that third possibility did not occur to me in that fleeting spell of inquiry. Amidst the shock of intrusion, my head spun around and then back again to my computer screen, to the nonplussed expression of my meeting visitor, who apparently had not heard the noise. Did you hear that? I asked. He shook his head uncomprehendingly. That added to my disbelief. Had it really happened? I excused myself momentarily, went to door, opened it, and looked about the hallway, which was foolish if indeed this was a violent assault still in process.

Nothing. The hallway was empty, the miscreant gone. At the end of a long stretch, a door at the far corner was ajar, revealing the escape, plus a warning: the intruder was still around. They could come back, do what they just did, again. What did they want? What had I done to deserve this? It’s interesting to note how fear and guilt mingle in such moments, as if random incidents are an indictment from the cosmos, yielding a Hitchcockian turn of events. In the realm of the unconscious, which encompasses all, such incidents have meaning. Actually, nothing is random. Everything is purposeful, I’m reminded. Crazy thought, I then self-reproach. Moments later, with my poise recovered, I resumed the meeting with lighthearted references to the inexplicable interruption—my fellow meeting participant still as undisturbed as he’d been throughout. Such privilege, I now envied, to be so undisturbed.

It will have seemed an aberrant event save for what happened the next day. This was worse. This time, a visitor was in my office, sitting opposite me, and adjacent to the window that looked onto and past that thin slice of pathway through which my intruder—soon to seem like my stalker—had snaked his way by. This time, there was no scurrying footwork rumbling beyond my door and through the hallways, heralding a violent assault upon my office. This time, the intruder appeared in the corner of the window like an intent spy performing a reconnaissance of his latest mischief. His beady, rat-eyes poked into the frame of the window, meeting mine as I immediately caught glance of him. He darted backwards, just like a rodent that sees itself being seen, that then must retreat to its dark hole. “Excuse me”, I will have muttered to my visitor who, just as in the previous instance, had not seen a thing out of the ordinary. It was as if others were simply not destined for whatever lesson I was being taught.

I opened my door, again inspecting the space in the hallway, though looking to see now what could be done—what might be done differently this time. Soon, after the current meeting, I’d make a call, alert the property manager that a problem exists in the building: we have intruders, stalkers, something like that, and something must be done! I nervily resumed my meeting, informing my visitor of the truth but reassuring that no danger existed…as far as I knew. We ended a few minutes earlier than scheduled with my offer to escort the person—a woman who may or may not fear bears, rats, men, or adolescents—to the parking lot. This belied somewhat the prior reassurances, but the gestured was appreciated. What a nice, understanding man I am. Upon my return via an elevator, I calculated that I had spare minutes in which I’d could make that call to the landlord and level my complaint. Exiting the lift, I turned left and rounded the corner to the stretch that led to my office suite. There in the short distance I saw a lithe, floppily t-shirted figure stood before my door, his fists raised. Then he launched them against the hard wood, matching the ferocious sound and impact of the day before. “Hey”, I yelled, and then dashed towards him. Without turning fully, the youth spun to his left and leapt towards the fire escape door that was four feet across from my office. By the time I’d slipped through the same gap, he and his conspirator—the beady-eyed boy who had performed the spying task minutes earlier–were already two-thirds down the staircase, cackling excitably. I stopped at the second landing and barked a profanity, feeling bold yet suddenly restrained. Who am I kidding? What would I do even if I did catch them up?

I plodded back up the one flight of stairs, catching my breath and nursing the feint twinge in my middle-aged right knee. Time for a phone call. No more messing around. My sense of entitlement was further emboldened when moments later I was speaking to a property manager who took the call as if summoned from a magic lamp. She was sympathetic yet restraining a guffaw. Kids? I felt her wanting to say, reminiscently. She advanced a theory, suggesting the mischief-makers were from the family therapy agency on the second floor: teens who were enrolled in that program were meant to sit patiently in waiting areas, and behave. Who are we all kidding, we were both thinking? Still, decisive action would be taken and an officious finger would be duly wagged at the boys in question via the agency that held the mooted responsibility. With my voice calmed and my heart no longer pounding with indignant rage, I thanked my landlord’s agent for the adult attention that would restore my world to its much-earned (not “privileged”) order.

Now the episode is over. The villains are gone and the disturbance has passed, swept back into an unconscious narrative that will dissolve until ducks, squirrels, possibly rats and men and bears, come to resurrect it. What protests exist that stir from the cracks, taking revenge and flipping the scripts of who or what has power, if only for a hot minute of time.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

What’s wrong with my approach?

He sat down before his laptop, extending a finger to the screen like he was adjusting controls, a pilot making final preparations ahead of the flight. He adjusted his seat, making it higher, or at least higher such that he could aim his gaze downwardly at me. A requirement, I figured. “Good morning,” he said chirpily. I returned a tense greeting, feeling a bit like I did the last time I was in a dentist chair. Where are those torturous needles, I wondered? I always imagine that when I go there, my hygienist will start off lightly, performing a gentle prodding here and there with puffy, soft fingers. The only pressure I’d feel would be in my gums as they harden, showing off their sturdy endurance. Hmm…looks good, you’re doing well, I expect to hear.

“So, what’s your problem with my approach?”, my colleague asked. My colleague? Are we intertwined, at odds, collaborative in any way. I don’t know else to call him. My interlocutor seemed best in the moment.

“Right, straight in, I see”. With the needles, I added inwardly. “Well, let’s see. Where to begin”. He chuckled, thinking this a friendly exercise. He opened his mouth, readying a statement. I think the question was a ruse. He didn’t really want me to start. He wanted to appear inviting, but actually spear in with his driving oratory, his oral assault. I opened up, bore my gums, my weakened incisors, and intoned, “I basically think that mental health treatment is a morally neutral exercise, as psychoanalysis prescribes, or has prescribed. And…”

“I guess that’s where we disagree”, he interrupted. He was still smiling. This was still a friendly exercise, though I knew what was coming next. “I mean, I understand that old school approach, taking a neutral position, but I think that has falsely justified a lot of neglect, especially of victims, over time”.

There were already balls in the air, forcing choices upon what to juggle. Old school? I mused. A pejorative term, I think, signifying a kind of philistine ageism: what’s old is out, or should be. What’s new is necessarily that and ought to be ushered in asap.

“We might, though you’ve stepped in before I’ve even named the alternative to neutrality. Should I yield and just…let you?”

“No, go ahead”

“By the way, are we recording?”

“Yes”. He was now terse: impatient to move on, or offended that I’d questioned his piloting skills.

“I think your approach is essentially moralistic. Dominantly so, actually. And I know what you might say, what you have said: that psychotherapy, or analysis, is an ethical framework. It is set up as an ethical entity, representing, if you will, moral values. However, it isn’t meant to be moralistic, I and many others think. It’s—”

“But what’s moralistic in my approach? I mean, I tell people it’s their choice, their decisions on what approach to take. I’m not forcing anything on anyone”

“For the moment, that’s besides the point I’m not yet making, because this part of the discussion isn’t about authority, as you’re suggesting. By moralistic, I mean offering the patient an idea, a lesson essentially, that is intended to leverage a change by appealing to their moral reasoning”

“Right”. More impatience, inflected with wary distrust.

I continued: “You, say such and such a behavior is wrong. You say it hurts others. You add that it hurts others in ways they haven’t noticed, either they didn’t know or didn’t want to know, and that distinction gets short shrift because the nature of their resistance is to be dismissed—”

“They’re narcissistic”

“—by assessment/partially diagnostic labels that are a shorthand for an explanation of why someone is acting in a certain way”

“Hold on, you don’t think that problem behaviors, the ones we typically speak of, are a result of narcissism?”

“I’m not saying that. I’m saying that labels like that are not motivational. If a person is stirred to an action that’s adaptive or not, they don’t go ‘well, I’m narcissistic’ as their half-conscious understanding of their desire in any given moment”

“Wouldn’t you agree that they’re not thinking of other people, specifically their loved ones, in such a moment?”

“We don’t know that, and I think you’re assuming that if they did think of loved ones, it would deter problem behaviors because that’s what thinking of loved ones does”

“Not necessarily. I know that people have mixed feelings towards loved ones, that they feel ambivalent. I get that”

“Well, I don’t hear that represented in your approach. As far as I can tell, it’s all about drawing attention to the negative effects of problem behavior with the expectation that your listener will then feel inspired to stop doing the problem behavior, thus healing can proceed. It’s like one of those TV ads that show half-starved, shivering animals laying in a shelter, looking miserable. You’re meant to feel sorry, get off your ass and either adopt one or make a donation. The ads not saying, what are your mixed feelings towards the neglected that might lead you to NOT act”

“Well, sure, you want people to act appropriately. What’s wrong with taking steps to elicit appropriate guilt?”

I stuttered, half-incredulously. Where to begin. “See, there’s the crux of your method: appropriate guilt. You think because you’ve called it that, and because your patient will consciously agree, as in agreeably if dolefully nod their head, that they will change their ways. What’s wrong with that? We don’t need therapists or analysts to play that role, is what’s wrong with that? That’s what preachers and social justice warriors are for, to persuade rather than explore thoughts, seeking to understand conflicting thoughts and feelings, not to vanquish them. You’re a mental health professional, and now I’ll be directive if not directly moralistic: it shouldn’t be that difficult to persuade you that persuasion as a tactic is at best limited as an intervention; at worst, it’s counter-effective. People resist being told what to do or manipulated in how to feel”

“That’s not what I do”

“I think it is what you do”

“It’s not. How can I persuade you?”

I paused. “Do you do case conferences with your colleagues, your team, as you put it?”

“Of course, we meet regularly, discuss cases, prepare a plan of action, discussion interventions”

“Do you each read transcripts from sessions, verbatim or near-verbatim notes, or make recordings, as we’re doing?”

“No”, he said tiredly.

“Then how do you really know how each of you is responding to patients’ process? How do you know how you’re persuading patients to experience appropriate guilt, as you put, or else being interested in their ambivalent feelings. And how, if you don’t hear instances of patient responses to your statements, how do you know if they’re really thinking about what you’re saying versus merely complying with your pronouncements? And why, for example, if they glean from the outset that you think they should feel guilty about their actions, would they even tell you about their mixed thoughts and feelings”

“Wait, aren’t you presuming that people will only share their feelings if they expect validation? I’d suggest that when people come to me, they already feel some guilt. I’ve not imposed that upon them, as you’re implying. They expect to hear push back. Secretly, I think—here’s an in-depth interpretation for you—they’ve longed for someone to take a hold of them and tell them what to do, persuade them that what they’re doing is against their values”

“That’s the authority piece, and you may have a point that people are looking for a version of parenting via the therapeutic relationship”

“Well then?”

Now I chuckled. “Interesting. You say that as if you think the matter resolved”

“Well, you seem like you’re affirming that a parent-like, values-validating approach is indicated, which would be healing. What’s next?”

“Indeed”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Right to Cry Thunderbone

X: Can you believe what happened to Eddie J?

Y: Of course I can, nothing surprises anymore

X: Yeah, but I mean, it was way uncool after his dog died

Y: that doesn’t make him a good person

X: still, it’s about respect

Y: respect for who, Eddie J?

X: For the fact that he’s going through something…I mean, be human is all I’m saying

Y: It’s not all you’re saying. From your post it sounded like you thought people should be fired or even arrested for calling him out

X: Well, yeah. It’s totally inappropriate, don’t you think? It’s not the right time.

Y: Problem is, doesn’t that cut both ways? People who were fans of his had no problem singing his praises, saying what a great guy he is

X: What’s wrong with that?

Y: nothing, except it’s one-sided to say only speak positively, leaving out what’s critical or even insulting, just because it’s “not the right time”. When does it become the right time to accurately speak to a deceased person’s reputation across divides? People have a right to give an opinion

X: So do I and I say IT’S BULLSHIT

Y: actually, you’re shouting that, plus wanting people to be fired or arrested, which is more than giving an opinion

X: It’s my opinion that they should be arrested

Y: Okay, you have a right to say that

X: Well then…

Y: Well what?

X: Then they should be fired and arrested

Y: (laughing) no, there’s a difference between saying that and having the power to put it into effect

X: we can if enough people say so. That’s democracy, the social contract

Y: not really, it’s a matter of law whether someone gets arrested, at least

X: laws are democratic because we vote for people who make the laws

Y: right but we have certain inalienable rights that supersede the kind of legislation you’re talking about—one of them is free speech. People can say what they like about Eddie J as long as it’s not slander, as in factually incorrect, versus an opinion, like calling someone a jerk

X: or calling for violence

Y: nobody called for violence against Eddie J or his dog

X: they did, they used words that led to violence. It was…whaddya call it?

Y: a dog whistle?

X: no, smart ass. It was hate speech

Y: that’s not calling for violence. You’re allowed to hate, otherwise calling me a smart ass would be grounds for you being fired or arrested

X: that’s not what I mean. It was way worse than that, come on. I’m talking about words, certain words, equaling hatred, and therefore violence. Words are violence

Y: last week it was silence equals violence. Make up your mind

X: sometimes silence is violence if you’re not speaking up when you should

Y: should I lose my job or get arrested if I don’t say anything about issues you think are important?

X: No, I’m not saying that

Y: silence is violence, you said, so why wouldn’t it be punished

X: not in that way, I just mean you should be criticized

Y: or yelled at

X: I’M NOT YELLING

Y: I think your voice is hurting my foot

X: whatever, now you’re blaming me, playing the victim. There’s way too much blaming and fingerpointing going on right now. I blame the left for that.

Y: You see me as on the left?

X: No, you’re in the middle, but that’s bad too. Anyway, I’m outa here, not talking to you

Y: Or “liking” my posts anymore, none of which are political

X: That’s right. Maybe you should be fired, or arrested if you think it’s okay to mock someone whose dog just died just because you don’t like them for dissing on your favorite band, whatever they’re called

Y: Thunderbone. Greatest band ever! It should be so declared by the highest authorities, like chatgbt. To suggest anything else is false news, disinformation, or misinformation, whatever the difference between those things is. And it’s the only issue that really matters. It should be illegal to diss on TB, or even fail to invoke their name, like you just did: punishable by job loss, incarceration, public stoning, banishment to a leper colony…like a red state

X: Ugh, I knew it. You said red state, you hater! You’re on the left. Bye

Y: It was a joke. What, are you banning me?

X: yes, and your stupid blog

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wow

Wow…

              The narrow hallway of the eighth floor stretches westwards to a cul de sac and a small waist-high window letting in sun from a Pacific horizon. You can almost hear the echoes of an architect screaming to a builder, give ‘em some light, please. The units are a good dozen to a floor, expertly welded into a taut floor plan that allows an illusion of space being devoted elsewhere. As I walk down the wing towards Steve’s address, I note the change in color scheme and the insulated feeling. The walls are a cobalt blue exuding calm and security, a far cry from the sunburnt orange that adorned the interior when I’d first visited years ago. The once-well trodden carpet, similarly singed, has been replaced by a thicker material that fully absorbs footsteps, vacating the last sounds of an old creaking floorboard. Disconcerting, I imagine, for those residents whose ears are never far from a front door, worried that someone unauthorized might be in the building, stalking.

              I press on Steve’s doorbell and hear no sound. Even the ping of a simulated bell is subdued in this determinedly buffered setting. Steve answers the door, beams half of his amiable smile through the crack and then opens up the space after the briefest of hesitations. I walk in past a plain door, unpocked by ornate divots, with only a penny-sized spy-hole blemishing its surface. Doesn’t he trust it? I wonder, regarding Steve’s pause.

              “Hello dear boy”, he says in a slightly affected voice—his nod to my British heritage, which he thinks entails people greeting each other with overwrought expressions because that’s how they do it in period dramas or hoary Ealing comedies that somehow drift into modern minds. He gestures welcome with a wave of his palm and beckons me past a kitchenette towards a cluster of furniture and dense ephemera. Apologies follow: “sorry about the…”, and “I’ve been meaning to…”. When we lived together, once upon a time, I might have scoffed and remonstrated, depending upon my mood. In my fantasy of lived disgust, I might have kicked something, sent a console, a bucket of food, or a lounging pet flying across the room. That’s when we had standards followed by expectations, plus an appetite for conflict. It’s years later now, so like the walls and the floorspace, the feelings have softened. Anyway, nothing in this space serves as a centerpiece. It’s all a trail of bits and pieces, some discarded, others merely detained ahead of a hateful deportation. The inviolate fixtures are a wall-sized television and a triumvirate of computer screens that transform a living space into the semblance of a stock exchange floor.

              I am stepping over and in between piles of consumer and consumed goods, heading for a dead end. “Sorry”, says Steve, realizing there’s nowhere to sit. Outside, on a tight veranda overlooking a glassy vista and concrete cityscape, there’s space for a chair that looks dusty and unused and flanked by a wooden structure partially wrapped in mesh wire.

              “It’s okay for me to stay, right?” I ask uncertainly, half-plaintively.

              “Oh sure, sure,” he replies. “In fact, I might be joining you. My friend Sara also might come”.

              I stare back with a blank expression, thinking there’s a piece that’s awry in Steve’s thought. “Might come? You’re thinking of coming to my graduation?”

              Steve’s neck snaps backwards as his eyes roll upwards. It’s like I’ve delivered a blow to his right side and he’s heading down for the count. “Aw shit, that’s right! I forgot about your thing. Sorry, I’ve been all turned around lately. I thought you might be at the protest tomorrow”.

              “Nah, I don’t think so,” I respond coolly, having half-expected this misunderstanding of why I’m visiting his urban lair. Steve shrugs. “Any chance you can come by later, maybe we can have dinner together, you can meet Sara”.

              I could care less about his friend Sara. “I’ll be eating at the center with some colleagues. There’s a dinner gathering after the ceremony”. He nods faintly. He can tell by the flat tone and terse delivery that I’m annoyed he’s forgotten.

              “Got it. This is your training program you’ve been doing, huh? That Freud thing”.

              “Analytic training”

              “Right. Do you get a pipe and a tweed jacket, or something?”

              This quip merits an indulgent grin, not quite the derisive smirk I’d prefer to give. I have his half-effortful hospitality to think of, to feel grateful for, though a hotel room will seem a good alternative at this point. Making a token effort, Steve grabs a cushion, wipes a swath of litter from a couch—ostensibly my bunk for the night. Then he asks that I excuse a phalanx of cans and bottles atop an adjoining breakfast table. “I’ll get rid of them later,” he says. “They’re just rinsing out, don’t want to put them away and get mildew”. That pings a memory. Back in the day, Steve was often saying stupid things like this to justify not doing something.

              “What’s the box for on the balcony”. I don’t care about this box just beyond a sliding door any more than I do his friend, but the awkwardness of Steve’s neglect is impinging upon my nerves.

              “That’s for chickens,” he says, prefacing an impending spiel.

              Chicken shit, I’m inclined to reply. “Doesn’t look big enough,” I say, indicating the box’s seeming three-foot length, its piecemeal disposition. “Where are the chickens?”

              Steve often answers questions not yet asked, aiming for what he knows instead. “Soon”, he says. “Collecting them this weekend. Been planning this for weeks, studying the raising of foul for ages. Gonna grow my own eggs, get ahead of rising prices. I just gotta put the box together some, wrap the mesh around it, do one or two other things”.

              “So, it’s a coop”

              “Sort of, mini one. Got a southern exposure here, plenty of sunshine. No predators around, of course. Just gotta watch the weather. Should be okay in spring heading into summer, though”

              “You got enough space? Kinda tight out there, isn’t it?

              “They only need a few square feet to walk, run around in”

              “Take a shit in”

              “No kidding. Got a few bags of shavings to lay down. Gonna start with three, see how they do, whether they fight, which happens if there isn’t enough space”

              “Don’t you have a cat?”

              “Miete? She died last year. Thought you knew”

              “Maybe you told me. I would’ve remembered, I think. Sorry”

              “No worries. Anyway, you ready for your big day?”

              Steve held a sudden look of cheer upon his face, suggesting I’d touched a nerve mentioning his cat. Now my life was a useful pretext for a change of subject, his chicken interest notwithstanding.

              I heave a practiced sigh. “Been ready for I don’t know how long. Feels like I’ve been doing this forever”

              “I bet. You started this…when?” I can tell he needs me to fill in all of the gaps of his unknowing, and as I do, I’ll see that his eyes glaze over and his mind will drift back to images of plywood, mesh wire and carefully marshalled chicken shit.

              “Seven years ago is when it started. You might remember the last night I stayed here overnight. I was applying still, had interviews with institute faculty at Zion hospital the next day”

              “Right. I remember that now. I seem to recall you saying it would take a few years, not seven though. Why so long?

              “Some elements are like college—you complete four years of seminar. The cases that are analytic: they have to get approved, plus you have to write an academic paper that’s more or less like a doctoral thesis. That’s what took the longest”

              “So remind me, if you don’t mind, what happens next? Do you get an extra credential?”

              “I’m a psychoanalyst”

              “Okay, you’ve said that before. But what does that mean? Could I just call you up and ask you for psychoanalysis, come lie on a couch in your office and have you interpret my dreams?”

              “That’s the last thing you’d want, believe me”

              Steve burst out a light chuckle. “Why? Am I that bad? Beyond help?”

              “Let’s just say it wouldn’t be your thing. You’re more of a go-to-a-retreat, take ketamine with somebody watching and then have what you think is a cathartic experience followed by a day at a spa.”

              “I have done something like that actually. My therapist, whom I see about four times a year recommended something similar to me, only with psilocybin, not ketamine”

              “So, did you do that?

              “Not yet. Haven’t gotten around to it. We’ve been doing EMDR, which I also find cathartic—lots of childhood stuff comes up for me. Deep stuff. You should try it. Or, you should get the certificate for it, gets lots of clients that way”

              “I did…twenty years ago. Now I do psychoanalysis, that Freudian thing I’ve mentioned a few times over the last few years. It’s different. It’s an older model of treatment: the patient speaks. An analyst listens. No drugs. No tricks. And you meet four times a week, not four times in a year.”

              “Four times a week! You’re kidding”

              I am not kidding, my face says. I’ve said this to him before, several times in fact.

              Steve’s incredulity resumes: “I mean, I know you’ve mentioned that before, I just can’t believe anyone does that. Jeez, who can do that? Who has the money for it?”

              “You’re presuming that an analyst would charge you three hundred dollars per hour like the person who watches you take acid does”

              “Well, okay, so you’re saying it’s less expensive, but still…the time…”

              “What about it?”

              “Who has the time? Plus, I don’t know. I’d run out of things to say”

              For a half-minute I remain still-faced, myself incredulous, except to think you might. I hold my mean-spirited tongue, for a moment at least. I gaze around, shoot incriminating glances at random objects that signify a random existence.

              “The time? Like the time spent staring at that trio of screens, or that massive Orwellian eye in the middle of your wall-space? The time spent binging on eye candy, brain candy, or actual candy? Run out of things to say? If you mean platitudes, banal chatter, the dinner theater of modern politics, then sure, you’d run out of things to say? If you mean catching up on what’s happening in your life, or even retaining what’s happening after the last time you spoke to someone, then sure you’ll run out of things to say. If you mean external events, or how’s your health or how’s the family doing, or the kind of stuff anyone can understand without much effort at explanation, then sure you’ll run out of things to say. If you mean the stuff that you think others will understand or not form a half-understanding judgement or sample of disgust about, then sure you’ll run out of things to say”

              At once, Steve frowns and speaks in a low, measured voice.

              “You sound annoyed. Have I annoyed you?”

              I pause for effect and hold my friend’s attention with a fixed, unblinking glare. “That’s psychoanalysis,” I say.

              He shakes his head, befuddled. “What? what is psychoanalysis?”

              “What you just did. You responded as if everything I just said had something to do with you, or you and I”

              “I’m sorry, I’m not trying to make this about me—”

              “I’m not criticizing that, you prat. It is about you and me. That’s what I’m saying—what you just did was an analytic thing to do, and a truly interpersonal thing to do, only it’s ironic because you think it’s merely self-centered”

              He shook his head again. “Right. What? What are you saying? Making it about me, or about you and I is the right thing. How can that be?”

              “It’s easy if you think about a principle that you haven’t been studying and thinking about for nearly a decade but I have. It’s this: when YOU’RE TALKING TO SOMEONE, WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY IS AT LEAST PARTLY AND SOMETIMES MOSTLY ABOUT THEM”

              “Why are you yelling?

              “I’m not…okay, I am…just because you haven’t listened, not really. Nobody really…”

              By this point Steve was staring at me like an emergency room nurse performing a mental health exam. “My big day. It is a big day, and I didn’t fully realize until today that it bums me out that you barely understand what it’s about, this big day of mine.  You think it’s a kind of joke, featuring cliches…”

              “Wow, I never said—”

              “I know you never said. You never had to say it directly. And it’s not your fault. It’s at least mine as well, the fact that we don’t get each other”. I gaze about his living space again. “I don’t get how you can live like this. That’s my judgement. You’re like those chickens you’re gonna raise. You wanna know how? They don’t have sphincters, chickens. They don’t control their shit. They just walk around and release and they don’t pick up after themselves. Someone else has to do that for them”.

              This remark freezes my old friend. He looks stunned, eternally undecided. Trying to seem poised, Steve walks over to his front door and pulls it open like he wants me to leave. With a cold, glassy shine in his eye, he asks, “How’s your wife doing?”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

My Peers

I’m trippin’ on the word, hearing its layered meaning, the play. I’m trippin’ on them, my peers with their protruding toes, hearing their footsteps outside my stall, their muted grumblings about the meeting. The break is nearly over. The clatter of paper and soap dispensers, the water from a fawcett, the violence of a flush, are all sounding out, signaling an end to the break. My peers are filing out, ready to reconvene the meeting. I can’t move. I can’t make anything happen. I’m stuck in my porcelain seat, waiting to evacuate, but then find something within that will gird me for the next round of work. All work. No play.

              I hear one or two peers circling about. I feel their eyes upon my stall door. Do they know it’s me in here, collecting my thoughts? He can’t do it—that’s what they’re thinking. He’s stuck. They glance at one another, sharing their suspicions, but they’re not supposed to say. In here, you’re not supposed to say anything. It’s private time, pre-verbal time, in a private space, and no one is at their best in such moments, we’re all inclined to think. That’s our big boy voice, saying pull up your big boy pants. Just do what’s necessary, wash your hands, then leave and start talking, doing your thing. Back to work. He’s gotta come out, thinks the peer who seems to linger at the basin, washing his hands. He’s the last one there. Otherwise, the place is silent. Everyone’s break is over, except mine. I feel his eyes upon the outside door, his voice poised to speak, say what everyone else was thinking a minute or two ago: two minutes, Ray. It’s nearly ten. You comin’?

It wasn’t like this back in the day. Back when we were kids. These guys: they won’t remember. They don’t know anything from before the age of nine, when games were fun. Yeah, they liked to win. I liked to win, but winning wasn’t everything. Fun was the thing. Funny—funnee—was the thing. Silly was a thing, ridiculous was a thing. We could be ridiculous, look ridiculous, before we were nine. Was it nine? Maybe ten. I can’t remember myself. I remember laughing, and wanting to be the one that made the others laugh. It made ‘em laugh, shaking my thing outside the stalls, flanking the showers. “Keep the noise down”. That was the only complaint: a gruff, peace-seeking rebuke from beyond an eyewitness (but not earshot) threshold by a locker room attendant—a truly miserable man who wasn’t winning at anything and didn’t like to play games or even hear evidence of them. A buddy of mine and I: we did a dance opposite each other, taking turns, like the display was a preening competition. We were showing off, but feeling silly, ridiculous. Nothing serious. Then it changed. After the noise complaint, the game broke up, but only for a moment, like it was the receding of a stream that would return via another channel in moments. Let’s do something else, someone said. They gestured to a pair of urinals, then stood in front of them like they were targets. His beckoned a peer to his side, held his hand to his mouth like he was telling a secret, excluding anyone who wasn’t up for a duel.

Maybe he was telling a joke, a play on words. That’s what comes to mind now, still seated in my stall, not playing the game, not returning to the meeting that will happen without me, even though I am in charge, sort of. I don’t want to play their game, take part in their name-dropping but not naming game—their nounless attack upon substance, and my word-drooling response: it’s a leaking, or a falling out of words, this civilly symbolization; a mouth bowel movement, disguised. They know it. I feel it, the primitivism, and the inhibition of later games. I didn’t play that game that replaced mine when I was nine, or nearly ten. I didn’t want to play the peeing game, seeing who could pee the farthest and still hit targets. I don’t want that kind of comparison; to win or to lose, those cul de sac dichotomies. Don’t want to step on toes or have anyone step on mine. I don’t want to stick my neck out. I don’t want to leave my stall anymore, deal with my peers. Yeah, that’s right: my peers, my fellow pee-ers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Three years later

It’s three years after something bad happened. Someone left this plane, this earth, and they won’t return. It feels like stubbornness, like they’re off somewhere thinking of how to return but changing their mind, knowing it’s against the rules. Funny, he was both a rebel and a stickler for rules, my friend. In games, he was dogmatic, autocratic, plus a few other “ics” in the mix. He wanted things his way—that was the annoying, and ultimately tragic governing principle. Today, I say goodbye to him again, it being an anniversary. I recall the good parts of his self, and only allude to the bad, following the tacit rules of grief. My shoulds enter the fray, influenced by what others say and write, their forlorn and sentimentalist tributes. He was a good this, a great that. We miss him. We are grateful for the time we had together, etc. He had a range of qualities, from good to bad, plus a vast in-between that renders the binary choices less palatable. I feel some pressure to represent him fully, and yet to hold back, to speak around the truth, and in doing so, effect some manner of taking care.

              In a way, we’re following his lead. He led in this way, entering into the fray of most relationships, daggering in with his knifey wit, his manic rage. His truth. This was only sometimes, though the instances were memorable—indeed, they were traumatic, the way melt-downs usually are. Mostly, he was alternately aloof and jovial, and in this way protective of others while signaling the presence of an inveterate problem. He wouldn’t change, he often exuded. On occasion, he’d offer a promissory opposite: exhibiting a new self, cleaned up, polished, even wholesome. He could quote scripture, subscribe to conventional belief systems, be regularly friendly, consumerist, even mainstream in his tastes, his politics; an average good citizen. Only he wasn’t average. It was difficult masking the mild disappointment I might feel at these times—the disorienting reluctance to accept the loss of the miscreant genius in whose hijinks (largely un-violent) I lived vicariously. To watch him grow up was to let some part of my own childhood go. Recess is over. Time to go back to work. It’s like the malaise you feel when an exciting villain or clown gets subdued for the good of society. And there is no turning back. But there was a turning back, because in time his un-wholesome self would return, and in that return there would be a relief, plus a guilty pleasure that would vie with obligation. Yes, we must do something about this problem…someday.

              That someday never really came. A change came eventually, in the form of a passing, which started in a park on the outskirts of a city whose reputation is almost synonymous with the derelicted down and out. That was a place to collapse in and not wake up—to be picked up off the ground by stoical if diligent caregivers, anonymous to my dying friend. It would be hours before loved ones would gather and feel what he was already not feeling due a loss of consciousness, the horror of his last moments. If he could have spoken he might have told us to get lost, not wanting to be seen as he was then: bloated, pumped with chemicals that were meant to keep his kidneys going and thus keep him alive. He’d have whispered past the tube that was in his mouth that he didn’t want to be seen that way; that he wished he could be alone, for our benefit as well as his, because this ending was not worth watching. Get away, he might have said, his words slurring, his eyes glazing over, becoming dull. The lively clown, the sometimes villain, sometimes hero and more often something in between that friends and family adored, would not have wanted the final scene he was granted; the witnessing that he would have preferred to not have. Remember me differently, he would have pleaded. Think of me as I’ve been more often than not, more than three years ago.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized